The Lieutenant Governor believed Dow over his agency (DEQ). Who would you believe? BACKGROUND: EPA Collusion with Industry: A Very Brief Overview The DMDF floods. Does Cherry's decision to not require permits or a wall make any sense? Next DEQ Quanterly Meeting is THIS WEDNESDAY May 5th @ 6:30P at the Horizon Conference Center Neil Varner's letter to tone deaf Lt. Governor John Cherry Stunning flaws in the Army Corp of Engineers project planning Fight brews between DEQ, Army Corps over dredging spoils site Emails on the DMDF Briefs have been filed in the NWF/Lone Tree Council vs MDEQ in the Circuit Court of Ingham County. New photos of the DMDF Judge Ludington's Ruling Final resting spot for dredging spoils mired in controversy, then and now. DMDF Depositions re: Township of Frankenlust v Saginaw County No cost/benefit analysis for river dredging project Lone Tree/NWF file appeal Friends of the Watershed DEQ Comments on Zilwaukee Operational Plan Too Fast Forward Dow, state defend Saginaw River dredging project Resolution blocked by Dow Chemical call to Board of Commissioners. Committee Chair Ruth suddenly blocks resolution barring third party use of the Zilwaukee DMDF Commissioner blocks DMDF resolution. The DMDF resolution. Koski backs away from DMDF guarantee. Dangerous dioxin planned for inadequate floodplain dump. Federal Review: Yes, dioxin is still toxic! Dow’s Dioxin Getting Into People Too. |
![]() |
We represent concerned citizens, township officials and environmental organizations who want to see the Saginaw River dredged safely and quickly! We believe there are safe, available, affordable options for dredge spoils that do not put our health or our tax dollars at risk.
The dredged silt contains highly toxic dioxin that is known to pose a threat to our health. The proposed Army Corps of Engineers site was not designed for these highly toxic materials. <continue>
Read the letter from Attorney Borrello to County Commission Chair Hare.
"Although it is my understanding that federal, state and other funds will pay the County's costs incurred as the local sponsor, it must be made clear that the County is ultimately responsible for any and all costs, as specified in the Agreement, which may include, among other things, costs of clean-up and response, including studies and investigations necessary to determine an appropriate response, in the event ofcontamination." <continue>
The Campaign for a Safe Watershed is a coalition of organizations and individuals dedicated to cleaning up and restoring the Saginaw Bay Watershed.
A restored watershed will not only protect our health and the ecosystem that we depend on, but it is necessary for a thriving economy. We believe Dow Chemical must be held responsible for the dioxin contamination in our region, and provide for a comprehensive cleanup that is protective of human health, and ecosystem health. <continue>
Shouldn't we dredge the river to allow shipping, clean up the river AND support businesses upstream?
Yes, we support dredging! It will clean up the river and if done right, will protect people and wildlife. In fact, the environmental community has pushed for dredging the Dow dioxin contaminated areas of the Tittabawassee and Saginaw Rivers. And, yes, we support ship transport as an environmentally sound approach. The issue we have is the location that was selected for placing the dredge spoils. <continue>
